The L.A. Times has issued an apology to Sean 'P.Diddy ' Combs after they published a false story linking Combs to a 1994 shooting ambush on Tupac Shakur who was murdered in 1996.
'In relying on documents that I now believe were fake, I failed to do
my job,'' reporter Chuck Philips said in a statement on Wednesday.
''I'm sorry.'' Deputy Managing Editor Marc Duvoisin said: ''We should
not have let ourselves be fooled. That we were is as much my fault as
Chuck's. I deeply regret that we let our readers down.' source
P. Diddy issued the following statement after the article was published on March 17th.
"The story is a lie," the hip-hop mogul said in a statement. "It is beyond ridiculous and completely false. Neither (the late rapper Notorious B.I.G.) nor I had any knowledge of any attack before, during or after it happened. ... I am shocked that the Los Angeles Times would be so irresponsible as to publish such a baseless and completely untrue story." The story said that talent manager James Rosemond and promoter James Sabatino arranged the assault. They and Combs declined to be interviewed for the story, which appeared on the Los Angeles Times Web site but not in its paper publication. Rosemond called the story a "libelous piece of garbage." "In the past 14 years, I have not even been questioned by law enforcement with regard to the assault of Tupac Shakur, let alone brought up on charges," he said in a statement. "Chuck Philips, the writer ... has reached a new low by employing fourth-hand information from desperate jailhouse informants along with ancient FBI reports to create this fabrication. I simply ask for all rap fans and fans of Tupac to analyze this fiction for what it is."
The story, written by Chuck Philips, was the first investigative report published as a Web exclusive, said Meredith Artley, editor of LATimes.com."This piece was perfect for the Web," Artley said. "The Web audience skews younger. We had all these great multimedia elements, and we said we really don't need to wait to fit this in the paper." A "smaller version" of the story may still run in the paper, she said. source
Click here to read an excerpt from the article.
Now, newly discovered information, including interviews with people who
were at the studio that night, lends credence to Shakur's insistence
that associates of rap impresario Sean "Diddy" Combs
were behind the assault. Their alleged motives: to punish Shakur for
disrespecting them and rejecting their business overtures and, not
incidentally, to curry favor with Combs.
The L.A. Times issued their apology after Editor Russ Stanton announced he was launching an internal investigation to determine the authenticity of the documents cited in the article. After the L.A. Times was forced to retract their story a TSG investigation revealed that the FBI documents the L.A Times obtained to prove their allegations against Sean Combs were forged. The Smoking Gun website noted that some of the clues these documents appeared fake was they were typed on a typewriter instead of a computer and riddled with grammatical errors.
For example, the reports contain the acronyms "TNU," which
apparently is short for "true name unknown," and "NFI," short for "no
further information." Two ex-FBI agents said that they had never seen
those acronyms in bureau reports. Both men also alerted to how the
reports were dated, with month, day, and year set off with periods,
instead of the customary slashes.
Rap mogul Sean 'P.Diddy" Combs' lawyer lashed out at the L.A. Times. In response, Combs' attorney Howard Weitzman
issued a statement today (March 27) saying the "apology is, at best, a
first step, but it doesn't undo the false and defamatory nature of the
story, or the suspicion and innuendo that Mr. Combs has had to endure due to these untruthful allegations and the irresponsible conduct of this particular reporter." The lawyer for Jimmy Rosemond, chief executive officer of Czar Entertainment who was also was linked to the attack by the LA Times, issued a statement saying, "their apology does not go far enough," reports Reuters. source
The Times appears to have been hoaxed by an imprisoned con man and
accomplished document forger, an audacious swindler who has created a
fantasy world in which he managed hip-hop luminaries, conducted
business with Combs, Shakur, Busta Rhymes, and The Notorious B.I.G.,
and even served as Combs's trusted emissary to Death Row Records boss
Marion "Suge" Knight during the outset of hostilities in the bloody
East Coast-West Coast rap feud. In addition to the documents posted on the Times site, a third
purported FBI interview report was included by Sabatino in court papers
he filed four months ago in U.S. District Court in Miami. In that civil
case, Sabatino is suing Combs for $16 million over an alleged soured
business deal from nearly a decade ago. According to Sabatino's
complaint, which he prepared and filed himself from the Allenwood
federal penitentiary in White Deer, Pennsylvania, Combs stiffed him on
a $175,000 payment for audio and video recordings Sabatino made in 1994
of The Notorious B.I.G. (real name: Christopher Wallace).
But those FBI reports, dubbed "302s" due to the numbered government
form on which they are prepared, are nowhere to be found in the
bureau's computerized Automated Case Support database, TSG has learned.
The ACS system allows investigators to search various bureau indices to
determine whether particular individuals, groups, or topics have been
referred to in FBI "302" reports or various other bureau documents.
source
The L.A. Times posted a staff message explaining their apology on the Tupac Shakur investigative piece called "A Conversation on Newsroom Practices and Standards."
Most of you have no doubt seen today’s front page report that a Times story about the 1994 attack on Tupac Shakur was based on fake documents provided to us by a source for
the story. Simply stated, we got duped, and we have apologized. Here’s a link to this
morning’s story: www.latimes.com/entertainment/news/la-me-tupac27mar27,0,2043351.story.
Situations like this are thankfully very rare, but they do happen. And when they do, the most important thing is to understand what happened, own up to it, and try to make things right as soon as possible. That’s what we have been doing over the last two days.
You may also be interested in the statement Russ made “We published this story with the sincere belief that the documents were genuine, but our good intentions are beside the point. The bottom line is that the documents we relied on should not have been used. We apologize both to our readers and to those referenced in the documents and, as a result, in the story. We are continuing to investigate this matter and will fulfill our journalistic responsibility for critical self-examination."
David Hiller
Russ Stanton
source
The L.A. Times explained their newsroom practices and reporter Chuck Philips issued an apology . However some people may wonder if an ulterior motive was to blame for the poor investigative journalism. Was Chuck Philips who is a pulitzer prize winning journalist really duped by a con man? Or was the L.A. Times just anxious to attract younger readers to their website by publishing an article about the unsolved murder of two rap icons? According to the Associated Press the controversial March 17 story and related features on latimes.com attracted nearly 1 million hits — more viewers than any other story on latimes.com this year, the newspaper said.
Here is an excerpt from the apology article posted on the L.A. Times website.
Reporter Chuck Philips and his supervisor, Deputy Managing Editor Marc Duvoisin, issued statements of apology Wednesday afternoon. The statements came after The Times took withering criticism for the Shakur article, which appeared on latimes.com last week and two days later in the paper's Calendar section.
The criticism came first from The Smoking Gun website, which said the newspaper had been the victim of a hoax, and then from subjects of the story, who said they had been defamed.
"In relying on documents that I now believe were fake, I failed to do my job," Philips said in a statement Wednesday. "I'm sorry."
In his statement, Duvoisin added: "We should not have let ourselves be fooled. That we were is as much my fault as Chuck's. I deeply regret that we let our readers down."
Times Editor Russ Stanton announced that the newspaper would launch an internal review of the documents and the reporting surrounding the story. Stanton said he took the criticisms of the March 17 report "very seriously."
"We published this story with the sincere belief that the documents were genuine, but our good intentions are beside the point," Stanton said in a statement.
"The bottom line is that the documents we relied on should not have been used. We apologize both to our readers and to those referenced in the documents and, as a result, in the story. We are continuing to investigate this matter and will fulfill our journalistic responsibility for critical self-examination."
The story provoked vehement denials from lawyers for Combs and Rosemond, both before and after publication.
Rosemond said in a statement Wednesday that the Times article created "a potentially violent climate in the hip-hop community." His attorney, Jeffrey Lichtman, added: "I would suggest to Mr. Philips and his editors that they immediately print an apology and take out their checkbooks -- or brace themselves for an epic lawsuit."
Although The Times has not identified the source of the purported FBI reports, The Smoking Gun (www.the smokinggun.com) asserted that the documents were forged by Sabatino. The website identified him as a convicted con man with a history of elaborate fantasies designed to exaggerate his place in the rap music firmament. He is currently in federal prison on fraud charges.
"The Times appears to have been hoaxed by an imprisoned con man and accomplished document forger, an audacious swindler who has created a fantasy world in which he managed hip-hop luminaries," the Smoking Gun reported.
Combs' lawyer Howard Weitzman, in a letter to Times Publisher David Hiller, called the story inaccurate. He expanded an earlier demand for a retraction and said he believed that The Times' conduct met the legal standard for "actual malice," which would allow a public figure such as Combs to obtain damages in a libel suit.